Sleeve resection uniportal video assisted thoracoscopic surgery, feasible and reproducible: case report.

Sleeve resection is used in central lung cancer and the objective is to preserve normal lung tissues. Uniportal VATS approach is a complex and challenging new technique that offers the benefits of minimal invasion, without increasing the risks. We presented a 41-year-old male patient, with history of cough with hemoptysis due to an exophytic lesion of the right main bronchus. Diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor type 1 (carcinoid tumor) was confirmed with bronchoscopy. Complete circumferential resection was performed, with terminal-terminal anastomosis and reconstruction. Satisfactory postoperative evolution. In post-surgical follow-up.

La resección bronquial en manga se emplea en tumores pulmonares que invaden estructuras centrales con el objetivo de preservar tejido pulmonar funcional. El abordaje VATS uniportal es una técnica novel compleja y desafiante, que ofrece los beneficios de la mínima invasión sin incrementar los riesgos. Presentamos el caso de un paciente de 41 años con un cuadro de tos con hemoptisis por lesión exofítica del bronquio principal derecho confirmada por broncoscopia, con diagnóstico de tumor neuroendocrino de tipo 1 (tumor carcinoide), que fue resecado por completo circunferencialmente, con reconstrucción término-terminal. La evolución posoperatoria fue satisfactoria. El seguimiento se realiza en consulta externa.

[The benefits of digital chest drainage in pleural decortication in thoracic empyema. Prospective, randomized, control trial]. / Beneficios del drenaje torácico digital en pleurodecorticación por empiema. Estudio prospectivo, comparativo aleatorizado.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged air leak after pleural decortication is one of the most frequent complications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of prolonged air leak between the digital chest drainage (DCD) system and the classic drainage system in patients with empyema class IIB or III (American Thoracic Society classification) in pleural decortication patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 37 patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized control trial over one year, consisting of 2blinded groups, comparing prolonged air leak as a main outcome, the number of days until removal of chest drain, length of hospital stay and complications as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The percentage of prolonged air leak was 11% in the DCD group and 5% in the classic group (P=0.581); the mean number of days of air leak was 2.5±1.8 and 2.4±2.2, respectively (P=0.966). The mean number of days until chest tube removal was 4.5±1.8 and 5.1±2.5 (P=0.41), the length of hospital stay was 7.8±3.7 and 8.9±4.0 (P=0.441) and the complication percentages were 4 (22%) and 7 (36%), respectively (P=0.227). DISCUSSION: In this study, no significant difference was observed when the DCD was compared with the classic system. This was the first randomized clinical trial for this indication; thus, future complementing studies are warranted.